Abstract: Seven studies examined whether people are more likely to avoid learning potentially threatening information when they lack the resources necessary to manage the threat. Studies 1 through 3 demonstrated that individual differences in personal (i.e., coping) and interpersonal (i.e., social support) resources predicted health information avoidance. Studies 4 through 7 examined whether manipulating the tradeoff between the resources available and the resources required to manage threat influenced avoidance. Study 4 provided no evidence that influencing people's perceptions of their own resources influenced avoidance. Study 5 demonstrated that people were more likely to avoid information after being socially excluded. Study 6 demonstrated that people were less likely to avoid information when they focused on their personal values (i.e., they were affirmed). Finally, in Study 7 affirmation eliminated the effect of exclusion on avoidance. Together these studies provide initial support for the role of personal and interpersonal resources in information avoidance.
There has recently been a lack of judicial confidence in the evidence provided by handwriting analysis which has highlighted the need for objective research to be conducted in this area. In response this study has examined the principles and practices of two of the field’s most complex areas...
We propose a novel approach for analyzing scribal behavior quantitatively using information about the handwriting of characters. To implement this approach, we develop a computational framework that recovers this information and decomposes the characters into primitives (called strokes) to create a...